Magic and Magic Wands
Lets examine what other information comes to us that defines
a performer. Of course, central to our knowledge is what
tricks he performed but a magician’s program is often
filled with descriptions so rich in hyperbole that we can
only guess as to the effect. And we may find the performer
defined by a single trick that, for example, misses the illusionist’s
ability to connect with the audience by ingratiating himself
with the small magic he presents while the next illusion
is being set up behind the curtain. Nonetheless, it is a
big step if we have an accurate listing of exactly what tricks
a magician performed in set acts. It is surprising how seldom
we really have accurate or virtually any information in this
regard. We all know of Herrmann the Great, but how many of
us have any concept of the ratio of his illusions to the
smaller magic in his shows or could list five tricks that
he performed? We all know that Houdini performed magic as
well as escapes and spiritualist exposes but besides the
vanishing elephant, what tricks did he do? Books are filled
with the magic of Dai Vernon but when he had private dates,
what tricks did he choose to perform?
This brings us to another point, which is how magicians
retain their popularity in the magic community throughout
the passage of time. Often this is a function of who gets
written up in magic magazines, who gets associated with what
trick, who writes or has written about them a classic text
of magic, who ingratiates his or herself to the subculture
of magic conventions. This has little to do with who went
over best with an audience, had the longest career, made
the most money, or even had the most public recognition.
Magician’s magicians with tricks in our repertoires
survive; successful performer’s lasting place in our
conscientiousness is much more problematic. Gali-Gali and
Russell Swann performed in top spots throughout the United
States for years and years and years while other magicians
with more prominent stars in the magic firmament were performing
at magic wand conventions
or getting good press in magic journals, thus ensuring themselves
a more lasting legacy with the magic community. Perhaps Swann
and Gali-Gali were too busy to performing to attend conventions,
perhaps their magic was too pedestrian to interest the amateur
seeking new effects, perhaps their agents thought it inadvisable,
or perhaps they were just in show business while others gravitated
more toward the camaraderie that the magic community provides.
|